Tagged: x
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 20, 2016 at 10:14 am #1050756
Praxis ResearchParticipantHi,
Even when I select the option to insert a ‘thumbnail’ (150×150) version of an image, a huge image is loaded instead. I’ve even seen it enlarge an image beyond its ORIGINAL size. This is a big problem for layout.
June 20, 2016 at 10:20 am #1050785
Praxis ResearchParticipantThis reply has been marked as private.June 20, 2016 at 10:43 am #1050864
RupokMemberHi there,
Thanks for writing in! It seems you are referring the featured image that you can’t control because it will be 100% width due to design of this layout/stack. It could be done within the content.
Hope this makes sense.
June 20, 2016 at 12:20 pm #1051014
Praxis ResearchParticipantNo, I’m not talking about the featured image. I’m talking about images in the content of posts placed using the image shortcode or the image element.
June 20, 2016 at 1:15 pm #1051113
RupokMemberHi there,
Thanks for updating. I don’t think so it’s happening within content area. I have added a thumbnail at the bottom of the content, let’s check.
Cheers!
June 20, 2016 at 2:23 pm #1051238
Praxis ResearchParticipantI’ve since added the code:
@media (min-width: 979px) { .x-img-thumbnail { max-width: 40%; } }But, of course, that won’t help with loading, since the images are being loaded with the higher resolutions.
June 20, 2016 at 6:05 pm #1051525
JadeModeratorHi Praxis,
The thumbnail type option for the X element shortcode does not function like the WordPress image inserter since the thumbnail type is for the styling of the image added through the shortcode.
You might want to consider compressing the image files to lessen it’s size for a shorter load time.
-
AuthorPosts
- <script> jQuery(function($){ $("#no-reply-1050756 .bbp-template-notice, .bbp-no-topic .bbp-template-notice").removeClass('bbp-template-notice'); }); </script>
